Fairfax County School Board Supports Collective Bargaining for Public Employees

With Democrats gaining control of both chambers of the General Assembly after last year’s elections, one of the be issues being considered this session is workers’ rights. A higher minimum wage looks to be well on its way to being signed into law, for instance, and several other measures are being discussed.

What’s unfortunately faced some difficulties down in Richmond is support for allowing public employees to have their voices heard in discussions in their workplace through collective bargaining.

In hopes of making it clear that Fairfax County supports workers, the Fairfax County School Board voted to express support for legislation allowing public employees to participate in collective bargaining. This will be added to the legislative agenda the board presents to the General Assembly every year.

In the past, previous school boards have actually specifically included opposition to collective bargaining in the agenda. Realizing this is the wrong position to take, Karl Frisch made motions to remove the board’s opposition and express support for public employees having the right to collectively bargain.

The motion ended up passing unanimously and, after hearing from several speakers during citizens participation time, it was clear the board was proud to support the measure as members went into details about why they’re supportive of the teachers and other public employees being able to have their voices heard.

The following video is just a glimpse of what they had to say.

Posted in Education, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

At Fairfax Town Hall, Tulsi Gabbards Goes After Pelosi for Ripping Up Trump’s Speech

Rep. Tulsi GabbardDuring a campaign rally yesterday evening in Fairfax, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard expressed her disappointment in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to tear up her copy of the State of the Union address Donald Trump delivered earlier this month.

“I would not have done what she did,” the Congresswoman said. While she wasn’t at the State of the Union because she was campaigning up in New Hampshire that evening, she claims to have woken up the next morning and noticed Pelosi ripping up the speech “was one of the main things that was trending.” She told the crowd she “just shook [her] head” upon reading the news because she was so disappointed.

“I think, like a lot of people,” she added, “we’re sick and tired of the political theater and the drama in Washington. It’s not helping. It’s not helping to heal these divides.”

The remarks were made during the Q&A portion of the event in response to a question from a self described Trump supporter. The gentleman wanted to know if Rep. Gabbards supported the ethics complaint Republican Matt Gaetz of Florida had filed against Pelosi. He claimed the Speaker’s actions were “beneath the dignity of the House and a potential violation of law.”

Although Gabbard did say she didn’t think Pelosi’s actions warranted an ethics investigation, she believed it helped to illustrate how many elected officials aren’t focused on the right issues.

“There are real challenges and real hardships that every one of our leaders from Donald Trump to Nancy Pelosi need to be focused on,” Tulsi told the crowd. “Actually working together to solve these problems and help people” deserves much more attention that partisan bickering.

Of course, this isn’t the first time Gabbard has gotten into a rift with leaders in the Democratic Party. Back in October, for instance, Hillary Clinton famously implied she was a puppet of the Russian government. The Congresswoman has now filed a lawsuit against her for $50 million saying the former Secretary of State “carelessly and recklessly impugned” her character.

In the lawsuit, Tulsi says she “seeks to hold Clinton, and the political elites who enable her, accountable for distorting the truth in the middle of a critical Presidential election.” This was very much along the same lines of the message that she was promoting during last night’s campaign rally.

While introducing her at the event, for instance, a supporter named Carl said “the corporate establishment has its foot the neck of every other politician,” but could never gain control of Rep. Gabbard since “they know that Tulsi will not do their bidding.”

This tied in with how Tulsi claimed that greed was corrupting the political process. Whether it was through financial gain or simply those in power supposedly being willing to do whatever it takes to keep it, she repeatedly spoke in opposition to “the establishment” and the current state of our political system.

“I hate the pay to play politics that rules the day in Washington,” the Congresswoman said. “I hate the politics of hyper partisanship. Of people in positions of power and influence who are more interested in keeping their power than helping people who they are supposed to be serving.”

This type of messaging could potentially tap into a growing sentiment among the general public, but her campaign has somehow managed to attract supporters who take the frustration expressed in her stump speech to a whole new level. As the line was forming prior to last night’s event, for example, several of her supporters were claiming Assad’s war crimes in Syria were really just a media conspiracy that people were using in part to make Gabbard look bad.

Others claimed the DNC was out to get Tulsi and were actively trying to prevent her from sharing her views during the debates. While her campaign isn’t the only one frustrated by not being able to qualify for the debate stage recently, other candidates don’t appear as eager to claim their inability to get enough donors or high enough poll results were actually a result of a conspiracy being run by high ranking officials within the Democratic Party.

The conspiracy theories being floated only got worse once inside the building. An older gentleman wearing a “veterans for Tulsi” t-shirt rambled on about how the establishment was doing everything it could to limit her influence on the primary process. He insisted this was actually one of the reasons he was supporting her candidacy. The 68 year old retiree eventually tied his claims about “the establishment” into a theory he was promoting that Israeli oil interests played a role in the war in Iraq. According to the people he was talking to, this is why Colin Powell gave his speech about weapons of mass destruction in a desperate attempt to keep world leaders in powerful positions.

All this is to say that somebody who simply listens to her stump speech might find Tulsi Gabbard’s candidacy appealing, but a deeper dive into her campaign and its supporters raises a whole lot of other questions. And decrying Pelosi’s decision to tear up the text of Trump’s speech simply highlights how the Congresswoman from Hawaii appears to almost seek out any opportunity she has to attack the current leaders in the Democratic Party.

For those who are interested, the audio below is of the exchange she had regarding Pelosi at the State of the Union Address.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Danica Roem Speaks Out Against Using Stigmatizing Rhetoric

When I posted about the comments made by Richelle Wallace was making about transgender people, myself and several other people pointed out that nobody said you can’t have legitimate discussion about various issues being discussed by the General Assembly. Everybody was saying we had to be mindful of rhetoric and how much of an impact it can have on the public — especially when coming from people running for office like Wallace.

Nonetheless,  the mayoral candidate continued doing things like using transgender as a noun (something the extreme right loves to do) and making other remarks that channel right wing rhetoric designed to denigrates the transgender community. At one point, she even said that allowing people to update their birth certificate to reflect their true gender would result in the government participating in deceit and transgender women being able to trick men into marrying them.

But Richelle Wallace isn’t the only person who refuses to use rhetoric that’s respectful of others and that’s why Del. Danica Roem spoke out against people using language that stigmatizes or alienates people. Her comments during a legislative hearing are worth listening to and bring forth an important message.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mayoral Candidate Richelle Wallace Spews Anti-Trans Rhetoric on Social Media

no hateLocal elected officials often have a significant amount of influence over how welcoming their communities are for the LGBT community and other groups who face discrimination. They not only help govern the locality, but can help promote a certain set of values that places an emphasis on ensuring everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive. It’s therefore very disappointing a mayoral candidate in Hampton, VA has posted a series of social media comments that channel anti-trans rhetoric used by the extreme right.

Richelle Wallace, who’s running for mayor this year after losing a race for city council back in 2018, wrote a post on Facebook expressing opposition to legislation introduced by Sen. Jennifer Boysko. The bill would make it easier for a transgender person to update their birth certificate and would help limit the discrimination people might face due to their gender identity while doing activities that require identification documents (starting a new job, getting a driver’s or business license, etc). The mayoral candidate from Hampton, however, refused to acknowledge the tremendous amount of good the bill would do and simply suggested it was a way for transgender women to play in female sports.

There’s been a fair amount of discussion about how society should address the transgender athletes participating in athletics and it’s likely to continue. And considering how it’s a relatively new topic of discussion, it’s understandable that it’s one people would want to weigh in on. Several people, including myself, however, left comments on her post letting her know that her tying the issue of sports into a basic step towards equality like being able to update a birth certificate seemed to echo a lot of the rhetoric used by the extreme right.

During the lead up to last year’s school board elections in Fairfax County, for instance, the extremely conservative and proudly anti-LGBT Elizabeth Schultz hosted a meeting with senior staff members of a designated hate group that promotes an anti-trans agenda. Throughout the 90 minute meeting that was filled with hatred directed towards the transgender community, one of the designated hate group’s major talking points was how they claimed transgender people are trying to erase womanhood and are using sports as one of their ways to do so. It’s this type of rhetoric that Richelle Wallace is legitimizing by echoing their talking points.

Considering how Wallace claims to be a Democrat who supports basic civil rights, there was a thought that highlighting this might result in her changing her tune. In sharp contrast to that desire, however, it appeared as though she almost doubled down on using rhetoric that diminished the trans community and anyone who supported them.

Wallace immediately refused to take responsibility for echoing the transphobic talking points that some on the extreme right have a history of promoting. Instead of engaging on trying to figure out why so many people thought her remarks were offensive, for instance, she told one person “what you think is implied is not my responsibility.” That is a strange remark coming from someone who you’d think would realize that rhetoric matters and has spoken out against the type of rhetoric Donald Trump uses.

But as the controversy surrounding her remarks grew, it became clear this wasn’t just a matter of her echoing some right wing talking points in a misguided attempt to defend the integrity of female sports. Richelle quickly moved beyond just raising concerns about girls sports and proceeded to spew all sorts of anti-trans rhetoric.

IMG_2767In an exchange with a male who commented about the birth certificate legislation, Richelle said she’s “worried about someone being deceived into marrying someone that is biologically not who they thought they were marrying and it being legal.” To further drive home how she thought being transgender is actually worse than lying about an affair, she then added “this bill’s letting transwomen change their birth certificates from male to female. That’s not like lying about an affair.”

This comment was made after she created a story out of thin air about how transwomen would supposedly use their updated birth certificate to marry a man without him ever knowing that she was transgender. Following this twisted line of thinking she was promoting, Richelle went on to claim that would result in the woman lying to husband about why they couldn’t get pregnant.

Apparently still looking for ways to describe how horrible she thinks it’d be to marry someone who’s trans, she suggested someone who married a transwoman would then have “to live with knowing his wife was born a man. Nevermind the psychological impact this has on the husband and the questioning he will do as far as his masculinity.”

“They need the birth certificate to obtain a marriage license,” Richelle also offered up while trying to further her attempt to prove the government would be participating in deceit by allowing a birth certificate to have a person’s gender identity updated. “The fact that [the partner of a transgender person] was not only deceived during the relationship but the person was allowed to keep deceiving because the law allowed the deception by allowing the birth certificate to be changed, lies the problem.”

IMG_2779In addition to the line of discussion highlighted in those comments, she also suggested trans women aren’t actually women and trans men aren’t men. It’s a matter of basic decency to acknowledge that people are the gender they identify as, but Richelle made comments implying that a trans woman cannot be female because she doesn’t have a uterus, fallopian tubes, or ovaries. Her additional references to chromosomes and DNA make it clear she doesn’t view trans people as the gender they identify with even though there is plenty of scientific evidence showing transgender people truly are the gender they identify as.

Put all these comments together and it’s very clear she’s saying that transgender people are trying to deceive people when they advocate for identity documents and other legal measures that confirm their true gender. Her claim that someone should be more concerned with the impact a woman’s gender identity might have on a straight, cisgender male’s ego and perceived masculinity than with protecting the basic civil rights perfectly illustrates the disdain in which she holds the trans community.

When you get down to it, the root of the problem for many people was folks were simply trying to have Richelle understand why her comments were offensive to the transgender community, but she blatantly refused to listen and actively demeaned anyone who tried to stand up for basic equality. This tactic left several people with the impression she not only didn’t respect transgender people, but she also wasn’t willing to listen to what the public was telling her.

“You aren’t willing to learn,” one woman who’s a well respected advocate for the transgender community said. “You ask a question, then answer your own question. The article I gave you had a lot of factual information. I learned a lot reading it. You chose not to.”

“The conclusions I am ‘jumping to’ are based on YOUR words through this entire thread and the others,” the woman added. “You have people who are heavily and deeply involved in this community, are A PART of this community, telling you that you are wrong and why, and you show no compassion, no willingness to listen or learn.”

In a prime example of what might have been frustrating some people about the tenor in which Richelle engaged with others, somebody linked to an article published by the Daily Press in 2018 describing how the candidate hadn’t been paying her personal property taxes. The commenter wanted Richelle to explain how the city of Hampton would be able to fund any of her proposals if even she wasn’t paying her taxes.

Despite the highlighted article being published by a reputable media outlet and nobody disputing the facts, Richelle decided it was a good idea to threaten the person for having the audacity to bring up a valid question. “I’m warning you that if you continue, you will be sued for defamation,” Wallace declared.

In other words, she was going to file a frivolous lawsuit against someone who brought up factual information that could be found through a quick google search. This suggested she was willing to go to extraordinaire lengths to silence people who weren’t fully supportive of her campaign and raised significant questions about her willingness to truly engage with the public she hopes to represent. That’s not exact the type of behavior you want from a political candidate.

Of course, she might have begun to realize this when she actually told one commenter that they shouldn’t be associating her anti-trans rhetoric into her mayoral campaign. “Do not attempt to put my running for an elected position into this,” she warned. “You have no knowledge of my abilities as a leader.”

Of course, the entire reason her remarks even drew any attention was because she’s running for office and it’s easy to assume she understood this. That’s likely why, despite her repeated comments demeaning the transgender community and refusal to even listen to the community and its allies, Richelle insisted her use of the pronouns and names transgender people prefer proves she’s actually a supporter of LGBT equality. At one point, after claiming she wasn’t even responsible for her rhetoric being offensive to some people, she actually claimed to be responsible for gay marriage being legal.

“If it wasn’t for me and people like me standing up for the rights of the LGBTQ community and same sex marriage,” Richelle claimed, “it wouldn’t exist.”

In the aftermath of that comment, the old saying that actions speak louder than words comes to mind and the outrageous claim helped provide a clear illustration of what Richelle Wallace and her campaign are all about.

It’s simply laughable that she would try to take credit for making same sex marriage legal after repeatedly making comments demeaning LGBT people and saying it wasn’t her responsibility to care about how much they offended people. It’s this type of ignorance and blatant refusal to actually listen to the public feedback she’s receiving that proves she’s unworthy to serve as mayor of Hampton or have any leadership position in the Democratic Party.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Peaceful Crowd Holds Vigil Outside NRA Headquarters

IMG_2743There were an estimated 22,000 people from all over the country who swarmed into Richmond yesterday in order to express their opposition to commonsense reforms to end gun violence. Shortly after all of this wrapped up, however, a group of concerned Virginians gathered outside the NRA’s national headquarters in Fairfax County to listen to students and others speak about how gun violence has impacted their lives.

The optics of the two events were drastically different as the crowd in Richmond was filled with predominately older white males dressed in camouflage and military tactical gear while carrying assault weapons. It almost appeared as though the crowd was a poorly organized military unit waiting for the high command to let them know the plan as they headed into battle.

In sharp contrast, the group outside the NRA headquarters was extremely diverse. Perhaps the most noticeable part of the crowd was a couple dozen students who had spent the day down in Richmond, but the entire group was made of people of all ages, races, and backgrounds.

The rhetoric used at the two events was also noticeably different. In the lead up to the rally down in Richmond, many members of the crowd had been spreading misinformation and even resorted to sending death threats to some folks who supported commonsense reforms. The misinformation and hatred they preached continued during the day as they tried to scare people into supporting their cause.

The group outside the NRA headquarters was a somber affair, however, and featured the personal stories of several community members. It’s truly unfortunate how many people in the are have lost a loved one to gun violence and we got a vivid reminder of this since the first people to speak was a father who lost his daughter during the mass shooting at Virginia Tech in April of 2007.

In a sign of how much work needs to be done, he reminded us of how everybody thought there was going to be sincere action after the tragedy at Tech. But while there was a significant amount of attention given to the issue during the initial few weeks following the shooting, it appeared as though many folks simply forgot about it and moved on. At least until we saw another one of the countless other mass shootings in the years since — including in Virginia Beach last year.

“Many of you will remember back in the aftermath of the shooting in Virginia Beach when our governor and his administrator vowed to finally bring sane gun laws to this commonwealth,” the father said in an attempt to frustratingly illustrate how action never seems to happen. “He convened a special session and you’ll remember what happened. The gun lobbyists shut it down after 90 minutes.”

He went on to point out the Republican leadership, who allowed the NRA to set up a war room in the speaker’s office, claimed we needed to do more studies before any real action could be taken. Of course, he was also quick to mention we’ve seen study after study conducted while the NRA continues to fill the campaign coffers of candidates who block any real reform.

With all that being said, the students who spoke made it clear they were determined to see action taken by our elected officials. Many of them had traveled down to Richmond in order to lobby the General Assembly. Interestingly, they coordinated with members of the House of Delegates via social media to make sure they’d be safe while doing making their voices heard and were able to avoid harassment from the anti-gun violence prevention extremists who swarmed the city.

One of the first students to speak told the crowd about how inspired he was after having the opportunity to help organize the trip and work with his fellow students. He also passionately spoke about how they realize they have the backing of other tireless advocates and therefore refuse to give up until some sort of concrete action is taken.

“As you talk about the moral arch of the universe, we’re there and really witnessed and felt the strain of that bending today,” he told the crowd. “It’s because of all you showing up at the ballot box, showing up here, showing up every day to make a change, and we really deeply appreciate it. We really carry all of that with us and we’re imbued with purpose because of all of you. We’re never giving up and we’re not going to hand this to the next generation.”

Several of the students also spoke about how the outrage over gun violence shouldn’t just happen after mass shootings because they only account for “1.5 percent of all gun violence.” To really have an impact, the students argued, “we need to address to address the root cause” of all the violence. And according to some of them, it’s communities of color who are impacted the most.

“The reason that we’re here today, especially as a black woman, is because we are the most effective by the gun violence,” a young female student said while addressing the crowd. “We are the most affected in these low income communities. The gun trafficking of these guns needs to be regulated. It needs to be stopped. And they’re doing nothing about it.”

“We might not have changed anyone’s minds today, but we spoke to a lot of different delegates from both sides of the aisle,” another student of color said after highlighting how the group was “lucky enough” to have supportive people as they advocated for commonsense reforms. “Our opinions might not have mattered to them, but we made sure that our opinions were heard and that they know that we’re here and we’re not going anywhere.”

On what was perhaps the best message to end the event on, the final student to speak talked about how coming together as a group can actually empower individuals. And if we’re going to be successful, he said, it would be “by using love.”

“It’s easy to feel helpless when we’re doing this work, but after spending the last 24 hours with these people, I don’t feel so helpless anymore,” the young man proclaimed. “The way we’re going to win this is by using love. Love of humanity and love for people all around us. That’s something that we have that I truly believe the other side lacks.”

“We’re not going to make the difference unless we’re doing the action,” he added. “We can’t honor these individuals like Dr. King without getting involved in the fight.”

And it was in that spirit that the crowd sang a few choruses of We Shall Overcome. The group wasn’t necessarily filled with the best technical singers in the world, but it was definitely a beautiful moment. So for those who are interested, here’s a little audio of the signing.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Virginia Democrats Respond to Trump’s Iranian Airstrike

There’s been a lot of questions raised since news broke that Donald Trump launched an airstrike against Iran that killed Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani. While there doesn’t seem to be any doubt the Iranian general was a horrible man who needed to be held accountable for his past actions, people from a variety of different backgrounds are questioning Trump’s actions.

The airstrike seems to have been carried out almost on a whim without consulting Congress through things such as the tradition of notifying the “Gang of 8” before the mission was launched. There’s also no clear strategy, which puts the country’s national security at risk as there are already reports of potential cyber attacks by Iran in retaliation for the strike.

While Congressional Republicans have mostly praised Trump for launching the attack that could potentially lead to war with Iran, most national security experts and Congressional Democrats have spoken out against the careless manner in which the attack was conducted. Those making public remarks about the president’s decision include Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10).

“Suleimani was a brutal killer who deserved to meet justice, but President Trump’s airstrike has brought us to the brink of war with no clear strategy or plan,” Wexton tweeted. “The American people are not seeking a war with Iran, nor did Congress authorize one.”

Wexton not only criticized Trump’s actions, but would also later on focus in on some legislative options the House of Representatives is considering.

“Article 1 of the Constitution places the power to declare war and authorize military force with Congress, not the President,” the Congresswoman said while retweeting remarks by Rep. Andy Levin. “I’m cosponsoring the bipartisan #AUMF Clarification Act because there can be no war with Iran without the express approval of Congress—that must be clear.”

Rep. Gerry Connolly, who serves on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and was a senior staffer for the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee before running for office himself, also spoke about how Trump’s actions could have a devastating impact on our foreign policy.

“President Trump has unleashed the dogs of war in approving the drone attack that killed Iranian General Qassim Suleimani, the head of Quds forces in the region,” Connolly tweeted. “It will enrage Shia communities in the ME, further destabilize the Iraqi government and bring Iran and the US to the brink of war. A dangerous and portentous decision.”

Connolly would also later appear on MSNBC to say Trump’s behavior isn’t acceptable just because his “enabler-in-chief Lindsay Graham happened to be at Mar-a-Largo with his golfing partner and therefore got briefed.” He added that “the legislative branch” needs to be “consulted and informed” on matters such as the airstrike.

In response to the airstrike, Rep. Don Beyer took to twitter to highlight how the House has passed legislation that would have blocked Trump from attacking Iran without Congressional authorization, but “the Senate’s obstruction is a huge problem.”

Rep. Bobby Scott has also echoed the sentiment that Congress needs to receive justification in a tweet that said “it is important that the Trump Administration immediately present to Congress all the information it relied on to justify this airstrike, as well as its strategy as to how it intends to address this situation moving forward.

In other words, Virginia’s Democrats are actively making it clear their opposition to the attack isn’t because they don’t like Trump. It’s because his actions are part of a larger trend of ignoring the foreign policy ramifications of his decisions and refusing to follow his constitutional obligations to respect Congress as an equal branch of government.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scott Surovell and Patrick Hope Introduce Legislation to Ban Conversion Therapy

There have been countless studies over the years that show conversion therapy not only doesn’t work, but can be extremely harmful for children who are forced to go through it. Considering how kids already are going through enough while trying to figure out who they are in general, not just in regards to their sexual orientation or gender identity, there’s absolutely no reason for them to be forced into going through something that’s proven to have potentially devastating impacts on their life.

With that in mind, Del. Patrick Hope and Sen. Scott Surovell have introduced legislation preventing healthcare professionals licensed by the Department of Health Professions (DPOR) from engaging in conversion therapy. They’ve both worked on the issue in previous legislative sessions, but homophobic and transphobic Republicans did everything they could to prevent the legislation from actually becoming law. Now that there’s a majority that believes the LGBT community deserves to have its basic rights respected, there’s a stronger likelihood of the legislation passing.

Similar legislation has already been passed in over a dozen other states including Maryland and DC. And the Virginia version would simply codify regulations put in place last year stating that any licensed professional who engaged in conversion therapy with minors would be subject to disciplinary action from their licensing board for what’s considered unprofessional conduct. By codifying the regulations, future administrations wouldn’t be able to suddenly change the policy in a desperate attempt to implement an anti-LGBT agenda.

This is most definitely a step in the right direction, but there’s also a glaring loophole as religious leaders wouldn’t be impacted by the legislation since they’re not licensed healthcare professionals. This move’s likely designed to overcome objections that a conversion therapy ban would amount to religious discrimination, but it also means many homophobic parents would simply bypass licensed professionals who could truly help their child figure everything out and lay a foundation that would allow them to thrive.

In a statement announcing the legislation had been introduced, Sen. Surovell highlighted how this is about protecting children who are statistically already at an increased risk of suicide.

“Not only is this practice harmful to our youth developing their gender identity, but from a legal standpoint, conversion therapy is abusive given the mental health repercussions and has been associated with increased suicide risk. It is a fraudulent practice, found to be malpractice in some states, and this will protect our children from beliefs rooted in bigotry,” Surovell said. “The General Assembly has a duty to permanently protect children from being targeted and hurt by these dangerous discredited practices. Failure to codify this could result in a reversal of these regulations by a future administration.”

While echoing Surovell’s sentiments, Del. Hope also highlighted how it’s simply wrong for people to be promoting the idea that being gay or transgender is something that’s “a sin or disease” that prevents people from being worthwhile human beings.

“So-called “conversion therapy” is not only ineffective it is a harmful and dangerous practice, especially when targeted at our children. It’s based on the evil notion that being a homosexual is a sin or a disease that needs treatment,” Hope said. “It’s past time Virginia joined the medical professional societies of the world and outright banned this backwards practice. Virginia is a place of acceptance and inclusion and the General Assembly will take whatever steps necessary to protect our children from this destructive practice.”

This isn’t the only legislation that’s been introduced designed to respect the basic rights of the LGBT community. There have been bills introduced to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in housing or employment, for instance, in addition to legislation making it easier for transgender people to get ID with their proper gender marker. Other bills also protect LGBT students Virginia schools.

For what it’s worth, these bills aren’t just being introduced as a way for lawmakers to act like they’re doing something good for the LGBT community. I’ve had people like Sen. Jennifer Boysko passionately talk with me in one on one conversations about how she’s taking the lead on some bills to help stand for basic equality. While this might seem like something small, I think it goes a long way in showing how the new Democratic majority is truly interested in creating a Commonwealth where everyone has an opportunity to succeed.

In other words, Virginia has leaders who truly believe we should stand up to the values of being a “Commonwealth.”

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

House Announces Articles of Impeachment

In a press conference this morning, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic leadership announced they’ll be introducing articles of impeachment on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

Ever since Pelosi announced she had asked the relevant committee chairs to draft articles of impeachment, there had be questions about what specific charges would be used. The Speaker and other members had been noncommittal on giving an answer and said they were working together to draft articles that lay out Trump’s inappropriate behavior and are supported by the available evidence.

While this might not be something folks would say directly, how much support various articles of impeachment would get from individual members of Congress and the public at large was also likely taken into consideration while deciding exactly what charges would be brought. This could be an important factor as the Republicans are already trying to portray the entire process as a partisan witch hunt and it’s unlikely 20 Republicans will vote to convict (which is how many would need to do so to reach the 2/3 majority required for removal).

This concept hasn’t been lost on the Democrats. During her appearance on a CNN Town Hall, the same day she publicly asked committee chairs to draft articles of impeachment, Speaker Pelosi said that while Democrats took their oath to defend the Constitution seriously, it appears as though the GOP has “taken an oath to Trump.” Other Democratic leaders have made similar remarks, both during official hearings and during interviews with the press.

We’ve seen this locally here in Northern Virginia as Rep. Gerry Connolly told a crowd of Democrats in Fairfax County this weekend that he would be voting to impeach Trump. This wasn’t a surprise to anybody in the room as Connolly called for an impeachment inquiry back in August and frequently highlighted how the president’s behavior, especially surrounding the interactions with Ukraine, was an abuse of power that Congress had to hold him accountable for.

Connolly went on to bluntly say he didn’t think the Republican controlled Senate would actually vote to convict the president. The obvious implication was the GOP has put loyalty to Trump ahead of loyalty to the Constitution and the best interests of the American people.

Perhaps the obvious question that comes from all this is why move forward with impeaching Trump if even Members of Congress are admitting the Senate is extremely unlikely to convict him on any charges. There have even been some suggestions that Congress simply move forward with censure instead of impeachment, which would only require the support of four Senate Republicans and would still hold Trump accountable to some degree.

As was pointed out during today’s press conference announcing the articles of impeachment, however, Trump’s actions have “threatened the integrity of our elections” and “are consistent with President Trump’s previous invitations of foreign interference in the 2016 elections.” In other words, moving forward with any action other than impeachment would allow the president to potential steal an election with blatantly illegal behavior.

Rep. Adam Schiff also highlighted how delaying impeachment in order to hear from the Trump Administration also is not an option. Trump has already order administration officials not to corporate with Congress and there has been a lengthy court process already taking place for other matters trying to force executive branch officials to comply with subpoenas. Waiting on impeachment would therefore likely result in the process extending beyond the 2020 election, which would allow Trump to take even more illegal action to swing the election in his favor.

The House Judiciary Committee is likely going to vote on the articles on Thursday and the full House will follow with a vote next week. They will then be sent over to the Senate where Mitch McConnell will have to set up the timeline for the trial.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

I was Part of the Studio Audience for Nancy Pelosi’s Town Hall on CNN

E6572926-3459-46A3-BA19-74A06DEEF1F6I was in the CNN studios last night for the town hall Jake Tapper moderated with Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Although it’s been scheduled for awhile and impeachment was always going to be a topic that was likely asked about, the timing worked out to be extremely interesting Speaker Pelosi held a press conference earlier in the day to announce the House will be moving forward with writing articles of impeachment.

For what it’s worth, the town hall had an audience of about 75 people in studio, which made for tight quarters because it was a relatively small space, and lasted for just over an hour. Members of the audience where asked to submit up to three questions when they registered for the event and CNN staff members then pre-selected the people who would be allowed to ask their questions on air. These folks actually had reserved seats right along the aisles so they could easily make their way to the designated spot when it was their turn.

It’s also worth noting that while the crowd was definitely filled with some political insiders, it was relatively diverse — not just racially diverse, but there were a variety of ages represented and (based on conversations I had with folks) a good mix of professional backgrounds and political beliefs. And there was a noticeably large contingent of college students as John Hopkins, George Washington, American, Maryland, and a few other schools had students in the audience — several of whom were selected to ask questions.

Considering how the first 40 minutes or so were devoted to impeachment related questions and impeachment was a big part of how CNN staff stressed the importance of the event to audience members before we went on the air, it was relatively clear this was going to be the topic of the day. With that in mind, here are some of the interactions worth highlighting regarding impeachment questions:

  • Pelosi said she didn’t support impeaching George W. Bush despite calls from many Democrats to do so because she didn’t believe using misleading information about weapons of mass destruction in the lead up to the War in Iraq was an impeachable offense. She also said she didn’t impeaching Clinton because the GOP just impeached him “for being stupid” and suggested he did something relatively minor in hopes of sparring himself and his family some embarrassment.
  • The Speaker repeatedly highlighted how the founders created a system of checks and balances because they didn’t want a President who was basically just like the king they’d overthrown. Members of Congress are therefore continuing their vision and upholding their Constitutional duty by using the impeachment process to hold the president accountable. She did take a jab at the GOP by saying that while she’s taken an oath of office, “they have taken an oath to Donald Trump.”
  • When asked about the House was moving forward with impeachment when the election was relatively soon and could be used as a potential way to hold Trump accountable, Pelosi highlighted how the president openly encouraged foreign governments to threaten our electoral process before and is already doing it again to help his reelection campaign.
  • The Speaker said members of the Democratic leadership are working collectively to write the articles of impeachment and wouldn’t say whether or not the findings of the Mueller report would lead to any of the charges.
  • Pelosi said that the White House officials who have been subpoenaed should testify before Congress. She mentioned how one of the articles of impeachment being proposed for Richard Nixon focused on his obstruction of Congress.

While the majority of time was spent on impeachment, there were some other topics covered. The speaker did lightheartedly say after awhile that she wanted to move beyond questions that were addressing the White House’s perspective of the impeachment process.

  • When asked about whether the USMCA would be implemented before the holidays, she said they’re still working on language to make sure it’s enforceable. She added that it can have some great ideas in there, but it doesn’t do any good if there’s no actual way to hold all the parties accountable.
  • Pelosi said on several occasions that health care would be the most important issue of the upcoming campaign. It is worth noting that she said she’s a strong backer of Obamacare and is proud of the fact that she was speaker when it passed. When pressed, she said she would prefer to strengthen the Affordable Care Act rather than immediately go to Medicare for All. She did admit, however, that we might eventually get to a single payer system.
  • Jake Tapper highlighted how Pelosi had stated she might have retired if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 presidential election and wanted to know if she’d be retiring if a Democrat won in 2020. She responded by saying “I’m not on a timetable, I’m on a mission.” This might have been the biggest applause line of the night.
  • Since we’re rapidly approaching a deadline for a new budget (or at least a short term CR), Jake Tapper asked if another government shutdown was likely. She said she didn’t foresee that happening after the last one showed the political consequences for the GOP if they failed to even consider working to come up with an agreement.

There wasn’t really anything tremendously groundbreaking that took place during the town hall. If it had taken place on any other day, the headline might have been that she was pretty clear about her support for making adjustments to Obamacare and perhaps adding the public option instead of going straight to Medicare for All. Since this has been one of the biggest discussions during the Democratic primary, the comments would have likely received a lot more attention if they weren’t overshadowed by the day’s events surrounding impeachment.

Combine what Speaker Pelosi had to say during the town hall with the rhetoric other Democrats have been using recently, however, and it’s pretty clear they’re trying to channel the founding fathers and suggest impeachment is part of their constitutional duties and they’re fighting for our democratic (small d) version of government. In other words, they’re being patriotic and standing up for American values while holding Trump accountable for blatantly disregarding the rule of law.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Happy Thanksgiving!!!

Happy Thanksgiving Turkey

I simply wanted to set politics aside for a little bit and wish everybody a happy Thanksgiving. While we all are hopefully enjoying some delicious food and perhaps watching some football before slipping into a turkey coma and eventually getting up early to take advantage of Black Friday sales, I also hope everyone takes a few moments to take in the true meaning of the holiday by expressing gratitude for some of the positive things in their life.

Shortly after Thanksgiving last year, I spent almost two weeks in the hospital for a serious medical scare. I’m therefore grateful for improving health and for the reminder the anniversary provides that its something that can’t be taken for granted. I’m also thankful for having a job I truly enjoy and being surrounded by amazing friends and family.

For as long as I can remember, my family has a history of alternating between Northern Virginia (where I grew up) and the Philadelphia area (where some of my cousins grew up) for Thanksgiving. Even as we’ve gotten older, this has remained a tradition and I’ll be spending the day with family just outside of Philly.

Considering my brothers now live in New York and my cousins have scattered, it’s nice to have this annual tradition where we all come together. It’s been especially rewarding since we’ve added a whole new generation to the mix.

With all that in mind, I sincerely hope everyone enjoys the day and gets to carry on traditions or potentially even start some new ones.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment